User Tag List

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 102
  1. #31
    bcteagirl
    Guest
    bump, and a random emoticon!

  2. #32
    Prue
    Guest
    Its so cute!

  3. #33
    bcteagirl
    Guest
    ..

  4. #34
    Prue
    Guest
    Please read cndlady's first post in this thread, thanks!

  5. #35
    Smart Canuck alajen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,801
    Likes Received
    4
    Trading Score
    15 (100%)



    Bump! An extra tip about searching for duplicate posts... Sometimes an existing post will be missed because the original poster made a spelling mistake (gasp! - how often does THAT happen?) But the web address is usually the correct.

    I find that searching using a keyword from the web address works pretty well. For example, for the Child safety kit, I searched "safekids" which is a keyword from the web address www.safekids.org. That pulled up three posts that had already been posted for this item.

  6. #36
    bcteagirl
    Guest
    Moved the two reposts out, thanks for the tip and for pointing them out to me Alajen!
    Last edited by bcteagirl; Wed, May 2nd, 2007 at 03:20 PM.

  7. #37
    Smart Canuck
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    ON
    Posts
    1,932
    Likes Received
    605
    Trading Score
    0 (0%)




    I think placing a penalty system could stop people from reposting freebies. Moving reposts into expired deals only makes the post disappear from the main freebie section, but does not cut down the poster's candies. Knowing that, the posters will constantly do it again and again, after all, they ARE getting the candies and receiving some reprimand does little harm.


  8. #38
    bcteagirl
    Guest
    I was not going to come back onto SC until lunch time (am at the university) but the more I think about it, the more I agree with Cookoos post...Messaging both on board and PM'ing is not working.

    Reposts will not stop so long as We are *rewarding* people for making reposts! We are rewarding them for refusing to search, and eventaully Boo willl have to use his funds to *pay* them for reposting (I think some reposts come because they get more candies for it?). I think this is unacceptable....

    I think it would be a good idea (and forgive me if it is a complicated one to carry out, what I know about computers could fit in a commodore) if there were another button for moderators, where the Candies for a particular post can be removed if it is a repost. I would however be interested in hearing others views on this.
    Last edited by bcteagirl; Wed, May 2nd, 2007 at 03:21 PM.

  9. #39
    Prue
    Guest
    I think that is a fabulous idea! Reposts should not be rewarded whether they are done occassionally in error by a member or whether they are done repeatedly by someone who has been asked multiple times to search! Personally, I would gladly return candies I had earned should my post turn out to be a repost.

  10. #40
    bcteagirl
    Guest
    Thank you! Exactly, there are a few reposts of my own I would be willing to go through and give up candies for. Any other thoughts?

  11. #41
    Smart Canuck
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    ON
    Posts
    1,932
    Likes Received
    605
    Trading Score
    0 (0%)




    Some suggestions:

    First time: delete the repost (but keep the candies) AND give First-time warning

    Second time and on: delete the repost AND penalize by deducting candies (say 2 or 3 times of what a thread is normally worth: a 4-candy repost will cost the person 8 or 12 candies, a 20-candy repost would then be -40 or -60 candies)


  12. #42
    Admin Boo Radley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Ontario
    Age
    41
    Posts
    8,841
    Likes Received
    794
    Trading Score
    6 (100%)




    I think the best solution to this problem is rewarding candy based on rep points not the number of posts

    so if you make a good post you get loads of candy
    if it's a repost you get 0

    there are a few problems with this
    - it's hard to implement! I hate technical geek work
    - people can give an infinite number of reputation points each day which can make things go out of hand and people will end up with too many candies. I have to be realistic to make sure this system continues to function properly and people get redeemed as soon as they request a gift card.

  13. #43
    bcteagirl
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by cookoo View Post
    Some suggestions:

    First time: delete the repost (but keep the candies) AND give First-time warning

    Second time and on: delete the repost AND penalize by deducting candies (say 2 or 3 times of what a thread is normally worth: a 4-candy repost will cost the person 8 or 12 candies, a 20-candy repost would then be -40 or -60 candies)
    I agree with this.. I would even give two warnings, one on the thread, and then one through PM.

  14. #44
    bcteagirl
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Boo Radley View Post
    I think the best solution to this problem is rewarding candy based on rep points not the number of posts

    so if you make a good post you get loads of candy
    if it's a repost you get 0

    there are a few problems with this
    - it's hard to implement! I hate technical geek work
    - people can give an infinite number of reputation points each day which can make things go out of hand and people will end up with too many candies. I have to be realistic to make sure this system continues to function properly and people get redeemed as soon as they request a gift card.
    Yes, things get complicated very quickly!

  15. #45
    cndlady
    Guest
    Bumping it up again because there have been a lot of repost of late

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •