@
lecale-it's not just the DNA test. If the "thing" has led people to believe that someone is their child's father, even if he's not the biological parent (I've read of situations where a male has to contribute support even after a years-late DNA test supported his belief that one of the kids in the household was not his because he's deemed the child's father figure, hence reason enough to pay for child's support), he has to get this matter dealt with in court.
1)DNA testing matter (when I went to a college open house, I understood the gel testing method for DNA still takes a couple of weeks to do.). This is not going to be simple because of the legal and financial matters at stake. The test will likely cost something unless OHIP covers it (don't expect much). Ask lawyer how to handle this information if any or all of it has to become part of public record (or can it be sealed?).
Also DH will his lawyer to get genetic results on the child's and child's mother.
2) the restraining order (would this mean the member's DH cannot be in the same courtroom as well?)
3) the costs incurred by "thing" in causing all of this to land on member's DH and their finances
4) potential asset hits
And the FRO is specific about how documents/envelopes are addressed to it if being served notice in a case-if the specific wording is not on the paperwork/envie, one is wasting time/resources.
http://www.mcss.gov.on.ca/en/mcss/pr...t/lawyers.aspx