Yes...it was the attack on Smilesaver that I couldn't let slide in the original thread. She was just happy that she had gotten a good deal on a few bottles of Dove and wanted to share it. To get slammed in that way was just unfair.

Of course we have all learned not to share deals or to post brags...

I can appreciate that. I think I just have a problem with poor SmileSaver getting pounced and accused of bragging over a dishonest act. The policy I follow. No problem. I agree wholeheartedly. If she wants credibility, she should at least be honest then people will respect what she says. If a person isn't honest, people will roll their eyes. The fact she denies it all and plays victim is disrespectful to Smilesaver, to the forum and misleading to all who read the post. There was pure motive there we all know it, she knows it to. She just denies it.

This is a no win situation. My issue is the pure spitefulness of naming the Guildford Superstore. I have no problems following policy and no problems with having policies posted. It is unfortunate that my comment about taking care with our own brags was taken as rude. It applies to her, to me and to all of us who post. "Judge not lest ye also be judged."

Its really too bad she is not honest about what she originally wrote. It works for her, people feel bad for her. If they only knew the things she originally called the first op for her brag. I think their jaws would drop.